Perhaps you noticed that my most recent previous journal entry,"not making excuses"( edelsont.dreamwidth.org/27509.html), is in a different font, compared to almost all the others before it, going back quite a ways.  (Look at the "immediately" previous one, "Lies About the Weather, Nr. 731" (edelsont.dreamwidth.org/27354.html, to see the difference.)

Did you wonder why I made that change?  Because it's easier to make them the newer way.  If you just type your entry into the window provided by Dreamwidth, it comes out in the "newer" font, like in "not making excuses".  That is apparently DW's default font.  (Their composition "Rich Text" window allows you to adjust the font size, but not the actual type face.)

I was going through a pretty convoluted process to get them to come out the older way, to look like "Lies About the Weather."  Recently I said to myself, "Self, maybe if you did them an easier way, you'd create journal entries more often."

Let's see if it turns out that way.

Something else about the more recent one, "not making excuses": the very content of that one was about why it's taking me so long to switch all my content over from my old computer to my newer one.  Namely, because I was doing it "the hard way."

"Doing things the hard way" tends to be common practice with me.  So I found it interesting that, in this case, I was breaking that pattern.

Could this become a trend?


"How to Decide What to Do" is the title of a recently-added page
of my “site” at The Well, located
at

https://people.well.com/user/edelsont/philosophy/01-intro.html

All that's there, so far, is the “Introduction”
… which is full of promises of what is to come.

I have unexpectedly developed a case of writer's block: I
haven't written even a line, yet, of the (or any) following
segment.

I do have a possible inkling as to why.  I was operating
under an assumption about what writing this “book” would
entail.  To wit, that it would require me to be completely
“open” about my inner, emotional life: to be prepared to
lay bare any relevant detail about my fears, desires, or any sort
of feelings.

And I didn't feel able (or, perhaps more accurately, willing)
to do that.  I still don't.

However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the project is
doomed.  I have a faint glimmering of an approach that would
allow me to write the thing, without doing the [emotional] Full
Monty to quite that degree.

It would not be exactly the same book, but I think maybe I could
accomplish my central goal.  I guess you — and I!
— will have to wait and see whether this works out.

I apologize for any inconvenience that this may cause.




 

My last two journal entries were both about things I recently
posted at my “site”on The Well.  This one isn't.

This is to let you know about a couple of mishaps I've had lately: I fell down.  Twice.

The first time, I was a on a ladder in my living room, and then a twinge caused me to lose my balance, and then I was lying on the floor, on my side.  I decided not to use that ladder
again.  And I went on about my life, more or less normally, for two weeks.

Yesterday, I fell down again.  The culprit this time was some slippery outdoor stairs.  I ended up in a remarkably similar position—lying on my side—only on wet ground.

I took more drastic action this time: was seen at the doctor's office the same day.  Got X-rayed, confirmed an absence of any fractures, not even the “hairline” kind.  Wheels
were set in motion to get me into physical therapy.

This didn't come out of nowhere: a month and a half ago, I told my doctor about an increase in lower back pain.  What I didn't understand, then, was that such an increase is often gradual … until it isn't.  One day, you try a movement you've done before, but this time, the muscles (joints, whatever) can't handle it.  So: twinge of pain, spasm, fall down go boom.

No physical therapist yet, but I will claim already to have heightened powers of observation, with early indications that this may help the situation going forward.

This is what is known as a growth opportunity.
 

Home is the wanderer from my journey to Olympia, and other points in the Pacific Northwest.  But those "other points" did not include Olympic National Park -- nor Victoria, BC -- as I had said they might.


Let me tell you a little more about the Empire Builder, the train(s) that I took from Chicago to Seattle, and from Portland back to Chicago.


My friend Beckie asked me how many times the train was refueled, in the course of that long journey.  The answer is three.  From west to east, those are:


- Spokane, WA


- Havre, MT


- Minot, ND


Spokane is also the location where -- westbound -- one train splits into two, and -- eastbound -- two trains combine into one.


Anything else y'all would like to know?

 

 Yes, I’ve been sheltering in place since Friday 08-11, and won’t be leaving here until Monday (08-21): a total of ten nights.

And the predicted high temperature here, today, is still higher than the one for Marshall, NC.  Unlike the first five days, though, by now it’s only a little higher.  I’m glad of that — though, when I was planning the trip, I was expecting that Olympia would be cooler.


Something else I was expecting, or at least hoping, about this trip (though I’m pretty sure I haven’t said so, here on DW, before): that I would have the opportunity for a far-reaching, informative conversation with someone from the Olympia meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (in other words, one of the local Quakers).  (I don’t mean someone in particular — just someone.)


I am happy to report that this wish, unlike the one about the weather, did come true.  But not at all in the way that I expected it would.  How it actually came about is quite a story.

 

I'm going on a trip.  The primary destination will be Olympia, Washington.  I expect to be there a little over a week.

And yet, I will be away from home for most of August: not quite three weeks.  I expect to leave Marshall on Monday, 08-07, and get back on Sunday, 08-27.

Why Olympia?  The Pacific Northwest is usually a little bit cooler than where I live.  And I hope to visit Olympic National Park, and perhaps also make it to Victoria, British Columbia.

And why will it take so long to get from home to Olympia and back?  To me, that's not a bug, it's a feature.  You see, I'm a rail fan, and most of the miles will be covered by train.

More specifically, most of them will be on the Empire Builder.  That one train will take me from Chicago to Seattle.  And on return, it will take me from Portland (Oregon, of course) back to Chicago.

And the Empire Builder is the longest Amtrak route that I haven't traveled before.  So you could call it a bucket list thing.  Probably most people would think it eccentric to decide on that basis, but hey, it's a free country.  So far.

I really, really don't like summer.  Not in any of the places that I've lived since I left graduate school in 1972, at any rate.  All of those places have been in the Eastern time zone of the USA, and you will note that I now have completed fifty-one years of not liking summer.

What don't I like about it?  The weather, obviously.  The heat, and the humidity.  That's what you get in the eastern US.  Okay, bits of New England are partial exceptions, but still.

Would I be happier in a place like New Mexico, where it gets pretty hot but is always much less humid?  A few years back, I thought so.  I spent a non-trivial amount of time there, most recently in August of 2019, for the purpose of testing that hypothesis.  And what was my conclusion?

Strictly speaking, I suppose I would be happier there, weather-wise.  But not enough so.  I could conceivably still decide to move there, but, since that last trip, any real enthusiasm for the idea has pretty much evaporated.  Like summertime rain there: at times, you can see rain in the sky above you, but it doesn't reach the ground.

For that matter, my history of trying to escape from typical Eastern summers goes further back than that.  It was a big part of the motivation for the last move I actually did make: from the Raleigh area (in the region of North Carolina known as the Piedmont) to the Ashville area (in the western mountains of the same state).  It's the same story: I do like the summer weather here better than I did there, but not nearly enough so to make me glad when the summer begins.

In short, I really don't like summer.

It has come to my attention, however, that not everyone feels the same way.  There are even some, bless their strange little hearts, who enjoy what it's like in summer even in a place like Raleigh.

I invite you to tell us how you feel about summer weather.  About summers where you live, or — if so moved — about those in some other place you've been.

When you visit this here journal, if you really want the full experience, don't just check for new entries.  Scroll back a little, to see whether other recent entries have new or changed comments.

Case in point: look two entries ago, at " Holiday Newsletter, part 3".  This has collected three comments since it was posted on May 28.

And if you read those, you see my social network in action.

The first two are "anonymous," in the sense that Dreamwidth itself doesn't know who posted them.  Neither would a random reader (one who doesn't already know me).

The first comment, though, was not anonymous to me, because the commenter included her first name at the bottom of the text.  The second commenter didn't do that, so I didn't know who had left it; I guessed, but my guess turned out to be wrong.

Which brings us to the third comment, which isn't anonymous in any sense: I posted it, as a reply to the second.  Its main point: to ask Commenter 2 to identify oneself.

And today, having learned who that was, I further edited the third comment, thus "outing" her.

Exciting stuff, huh?  A reality show, you might say: learn more about not just me, but my friends and relatives too.

Back on March 18, I promised you [yet] another installment of my so-called "holiday newsletter."  I said that it would continue to talk about my interactions with people, moving the focus to social media (and Dreamwidth, in particular).  So here goes.

As it turns out, March 18 is not the date of my most recent journal entry before today's.  On May 13, I posted "Everybody wants a piece of me, I guess".  That's a silly title for a posting whose actual purpose was to let readers know that I had had hernia surgery two days earlier.

And that May 13 posting is a perfect example of what this journal entry is supposed to be about: how (e.g.) Dreamwidth could be an effective tool in strengthening the bonds between (e.g.) me and the people I care about.

You see, even for an extreme introvert like me, there are rather a lot of such people.  People who might like to know when I have something like a hernia operation.  Enough of them so that, in my weakened state two days after the surgery, it was not feasible to email, or call, all of them.

By posting it on Dreamwidth, I made it theoretically possible that they all would learn about it.  But of course that didn't actually happen; to the best of my knowledge, nobody actually found out about the surgery through that medium alone.  Why not?  Because very few people check my journal often enough for it to serve that purpose.

To the limited extent that that is anyone's "fault," it's mine.  The root problem is that I don't post often enough.

On the other hand, I might post more often if I knew that more people were checking.

So here's my plan: after posting this entry, I will begin a two-pronged effort.  An effort to post more often, and, concurrently, a "marketing" effort.  I will contact a collection of people who might be willing to experiment with checking my Dreamwidth more often … and who then might continue to do so, if I keep up my end of the bargain, and post more often—particularly, with "news items" that my friends and relatives might want to know.

My diabolical plan is more complicated than that.  But this journal entry is—as almost always—already quite long enough.  I will finish by inviting you, if you feel like it, to play a guessing game.  Namely, about the series of journal entries of which this one is the third: can you figure out what their content has to do with the phrase with which I titled them, namely, "Holiday Newsletter"?

 ... because I had hernia surgery on Thursday.

The "piece of me" gag works better for my most  recent prior significant surgery (over eleven years ago: a prostatectomy).  This time, they weren't taking something out, they were putting something in ... something roughly like a tire patch.

After the prostatectomy, the first words I heard from the surgeon, the next day, were "The good news is that we got the license number of the truck that hit you."

On that scale, this is more like a glancing blow from someone riding a bicycle.  Probably a skinny guy, too.

I am at home, recovering honorably.  The process amounts to a series of problems in constraint logic.  I'd clarify that by giving you an illustrative example, but I'm too tired to write it down.

Oh, wait.  I just did give you an example.

If you have questions, feel free to avail yourself of the comments facility, below.  On this journal,  you don't have to be a Dreamwidth member in order to leave a comment.

Okay, here's the long-promised continuation of my so-called "holiday newsletter."  First, a follow-up note to the first section, "computer programming," of the previous post: I finished several improvements to the Clojure code which calculates my income taxes, and got my federal and North Carolina returns filed.

What I promised for the continuation was some information about social interaction.

Background: I lead a pretty solitary life.  Not a surprise: computer programming and writing are both mostly solitary activities, and I spend so much time on them, by choice, that there's relatively little left for real-time interaction with other humans.

Too little, in fact.  And I am making that judgment, not on the basis of any general belief about how people "ought" to live, but on observation of myself.  Sometimes I "go with the flow" for an extended period while programming and/or writing, and end up in a tense state, all tied up in knots.

It took me a long time to realize that I was (often) getting tense because I had been solitary for too long.  But eventually I noticed something: not infrequently, if something led me to take "time out" from my "work," and spend an hour or two chatting informally with someone, I felt better—specifically, less tense—afterwards.  In fact, it finally sunk in, that would often enable me to go back to "work" more cheerfully … and do better at it.

Once I became conscious of this, I did something about it.  Actually, I became more consistent in something I was already doing … without consciously realizing why.  Since I saw that I didn't spontaneously devote enough time to social interaction, I started planning it.

This has evolved to the point where, currently, there are three people with whom I have scheduled weekly conversations.  The nature of the conversations is not so very different from ones that might occur without prearrangement.  But when two people agree in advance to talk at a particular time, then it happens more often.  For me, and these three friends, at least.

I am very grateful to these people.  With their help, I like to say, I have managed to turn myself from a "ridiculously extreme introvert" into a [merely] "extreme introvert."

There's room for improvement.  Not necessarily more of the same modality, though I don't rule that out.  I've been thinking about my use of Internet "social media" (such as Dreamwidth itself).

There are some limitations, pretty much built in, as to how personally meaningful—how deep, if you will—such interactions tend to be.  But perhaps, if folks figure out how, those limitations can be largely overcome.  I hope to say more about this, soon, in another journal entry.

Happy holidays, y'all!

What?  You think it's a little late for that?  Give me a break: it's a holiday tomorrow, here in the USA.

Anyway, this will be [part of] my version of a "holiday newsletter."

Since I'm posting it here in my Dreamwidth journal, rather than distributing it via email, it is potentially visible to the whole Internet.  That constrains the scope some: I'll be very hesitant to post any personal information about anyone but myself.

I see this thing as having three sections, each representing a category of my activities: computer programming, writing, and social interaction.

Computer programming: I do a fair bit of it, though I'm thoroughly retired from doing it for money.  I do it for fun, and hoping that it will be useful—to me, at least.

For a while now, I've been doing most of this in a programming language called Clojure.  Best guess: most of the people reading this won't have heard of it; if you have, give me a shout!

I've written a program that calculates my income tax, and currently I am finishing the updating and testing for the 2022 tax year.

Writing: my scribbles on various topics may mostly be found at my personal home page at The Well.  The newest items, at present, are linked from the Fiction and Poetry page.

That's two of the three sections that I promised you.  The last one, "social interaction," will be left for another journal entry (or, who knows, maybe more than one!).

I'm getting ready to move.  That's going to take a while; It's not at all certain that I'll even be ready by spring.  There's a serious need to lighten my load: you know, get rid of stuff.

Move … where?  My most recent truly personal journal entry, posted on September 11, was shortly after my return from a trip to New Mexico, which trip was undertaken because I was thinking of moving there.  In that entry, I expressed some uncertainty as to whether I was going to go through with that plan.

Now?  I'm leaning towards it.  Does that mean that all of my doubts and concerns have been completely overcome?  No.  But I've come around, pretty much, to the view that the only way to be certain that it's the right place for me is to try it and see.

About the "pretty much" part: my view of the decision-making process is that you can't claim to have finished it — to have truly decided — until you've taken some action that commits you to the plan.  And, for better and for worse, there's really no occasion for that now: the process of getting ready is not yet at the stage where anything I need to do depends on the destination.

That earlier journal entry didn't give a clear and complete picture of what the "doubts and concerns" — the uncertainties about New Mexico as my new home — actually were.  And I still can't do that.  But if I say a few words about one of them, that may give you more of the flavor of what the overall decision process is like.

So, let's talk about the weather.

A big part of my motivation for wanting to move, somewhere, is that I really don't like the hot and humid summer weather in North Carolina.  I knew, before the trip, that in New Mexico, you almost never get the "humid" part … and that, as a result, it tends to cool down more, and faster, in the evenings.  But it still can get hot in the daytime.

I deliberately made the trip around the hottest time of year, in order to see whether I could be comfortable with that weather pattern.  And that, indeed, was my first, and biggest, source of doubt, when the trip was over.  No question that I prefer the weather in New Mexico to that in North Carolina.  But I asked myself: if I'm going to go to the trouble of moving, should I perhaps refuse to compromise, and instead pick a destination which fits my weather preferences more exactly?

Maybe I should.  But, as I indicated earlier, I now lean in the other direction: toward acting on the assumption that I can't really know the answer to that question unless I actually do go and live there for a year or so.

Why?

If I answered that question thoroughly, it would take so long that you'd fall asleep before you finished reading this (if you haven't already).  One obvious piece of the answer, and a clue as to why it would take so long to be thorough, is that weather isn't everything.

But even confining ourselves to the subject of weather, I just don't think that I have enough data to make a final decision.  Another factor quite relevant to how I'll feel about it after a whole year: how long is the period when it's too hot for me?  If it's not too long, then maybe I'll be happy with just making behavioral adjustments during that period: slow down some, overall.  Take a siesta: already a somehat attractive idea, and the more so the older I get (right now, I'm seventy-three).  And, during the hottest few weeks, don't spend too much time outdoors in the middle of the day.

That last bit can get tricky.  It will help a lot … provided that you can spend those hours in the right kind of indoor space, in which the heat doesn't affect you too much.  (And, to make it more difficult, I strongly prefer that this be accomplished by means other than air conditioning.)

In other words, a lot depends on the sort of building in which you live.

You want to close the windows in the heat of day, and open them in the evening and overnight.  And for this to be effective, you need "through ventilation": openable windows on (at least) two opposite sides of the building.  Electric fans are important, too, during both parts of the daily cycle.

A further note on through ventilation: this is so important that it (or, rather, the lack of it) almost single-handedly ruins the chances of making an informed decision on the basis of a trip like the one I made last summer: a two-week visit to the state … in which one is staying at hotels.  Because, you see, "through ventilation" is something that American hotel rooms hardly ever have.  (This may have some relation to the fact that they almost always do have air conditioning.)

One additional important architectural feature: thick walls, made of a material with a considerable capacity to store heat.  When combined with the sizeable difference between daytime and nighttime temperatures, these give you the ability to fine-tune the indoor temperature, by learning when to open and close the windows.

There's more than one way to design a building with those properties.  One of the most effective ways, though, "just happens" to be the building method that's also the most long-established in New Mexico.  It's called adobe.

It has to be real adobe, though.  Santa Fe, specifically, has a building code which requires that practically all buildings look like they're made of adobe.  But the great majority of the resulting buildings are what is known as "fauxdobe" … and that isn't worth squat when it comes to keeping the indoors cool without AC.

And that — surprise! — is a good place for me to switch topics, at least partially.  The new focus: assuming that I do move to New Mexico, then where, more specifically?  To what local area within the state?

The previous post listed the three towns that I spent time in, during last summer's trip: Santa Fe, Las Vegas, and Taos.  Each of those is roughly in the northeast quarter of the state.  And I am still operating on the assumption that I will choose one of those three.

(A reminder: if you've only heard of one place called Las Vegas, it's probably the one in Nevada.  That's not the one I'm referring to here.)

And now I'm in a position to tell you that Santa Fe, probably the best known (and largest) of the three, has fallen to the bottom of my list.

One major reason for this is that Santa Fe — and, specifically, housing in Santa Fe — is a lot more expensive.  But there's more to it than that.

The new leading candidate is Las Vegas, which is probably the least expensive of the three.  But more importantly, I think: it seems more like a community.

(Taos, definitely still a possibility, is somewhere in the middle, in several respects.)

Why does Las Vegas feel more like a community?  I can't say for sure; I just felt that way, hanging out there.  Here are a couple of things that may have something to do with it.

The distribution of the population by age seems to be wider, and more balanced.  I saw proportionately more teenagers and young adults.  Santa Fe skews older: a lot of people have gone there to retire.  (Yes, I would count as one of those.  But still.)

Santa Fe also skews richer, and that, too, feels like a point in Las Vegas' favor.  I'm pretty sure I could afford to live in Santa Fe; I just no longer feel so much as if I would want to.  It's as if people in Santa Fe are into striving to be special, while people in Las Vegas are … just folks.

And now I can circle back to the matter of weather, and the housing best adapted to it.  Of the places under consideration, Las Vegas (or so I perceive) is the one where it would be easiest to find and rent a dwelling made of real adobe.  (Partly because I wouldn't have to sift through all those fake ones.)

In fact, the distinction between real and fake adobe could stand as a symbol for the broader cultural differences between Las Vegas and Santa Fe.  If I wanted to be snarky, I could say: If you live in Las Vegas, you live in New Mexico.  If you live in Santa Fe, you live in a theme park about New Mexico.

And there's more!  According to one of my Las Vegas informants, most of the city's real adobe houses are in that part of town which has the largest proportion of Spanish-surnamed residents.  (Not surprising: those folks would be more aware of the advantages, since their people have lived in New Mexico much longer than the Anglos have.)

So, as a bonus, I might pick up a little more of the language.  If one wants to become a New Mexican, that has to count for something, verdad?


 ... at least where my posting to this journal is concerned.  It's been a month since I last did. And I might not do so again before leaving for New Mexico on Tuesday, July 30.

And while I'm actually on that trip, new journal entries are even less likely.  I am likely to be saving up some thoughts, though, to be entered into the journal after I return.


And the date for that -- when I expect to be back in North Carolina -- is on or about Friday, August 23.  So in fact, you might not see new entries between now and then.


For those who have my telephone numbers and might wish to contact me, note the above departure and return dates, since in that range of time -- unlike most of the time -- my cell phone number will be the one to use.  I will have reasonable access to email while traveling, though replies might be even slower than usual.


Y'all behave yourselves, now.

 

Did what, now?  I went and wrote something more about impeachment, and put it out for the world to see ... but not here in my personal journal.


Then where?  In the Dreamwidth community called "talkpolitics" (talkpolitics.dreamwidth.org/).


The above URL is the general one for the "community journal".  If you want to go directly to my deathless prose about impeachment, here's the URL for that: talkpolitics.dreamwidth.org/2095001.html.


I posted it there on Saturday, May 11.  The title (or "subject line") for that journal entry is "Impeachment: It Comes Down to Courage."  While not representing any basic change of my position, it does "bang the drums for impeachment" a little more loudly than the last thing I posted on the subject, here in my journal.  Namely: "Oh no! Not impeachment again!" (edelsont.dreamwidth.org/8436.html, posted Monday, May 6).


I probably will not ... usually ... put an announcement here, like this one, every time I have posted something there, in "talkpolitics."  How often I do will depend, in part, on whether some folks ask me to.


 

Back on April 12 (https://edelsont.dreamwidth.org/7050.html), I said that I was tentatively planning to travel to Iceland this summer.


Well, um, I've changed my mind.  I'm going to New Mexico instead. In early August, and I plan to be there just over two weeks (not counting the time it will take me to get there and back).  This is relatively definite, since this time I've actually made the main travel reservations.


Why the change?  Two main reasons.


One: I'm going there by train, and I miss the long-distance rail experience.  (Which makes me an eccentric, so perhaps an unconscious reason is a desire to maintain my weirdness cred.)


Two: There's a possibility that, after this visit, I may decide to move there for good.


A friend, whom I haven't seen in person in several years, recently expressed the hope that I am "well and able to travel if [I] choose."  A reasonable question, since I am 72 years old (about the same as she is), and since she knows that I haven't traveled very much lately.


I am happy to say that I am [well enough].  Some types of travel may be a bit more of a hassle than they used to be for me; long car trips, for instance.  But I am confident that I can still handle, for example, the occasional plane ride.


And I intend to verify that.  I am determined to take a "real vacation" this summer.  And where do I intend to go? This is not definite until the reservations are made, but would you believe ... Iceland?


And I may even take one of those bus tours around the island.  Which would be an absolute first for me: I have never taken a bus tour of anything bigger than a city, in any of the various countries I have visited.


Don't worry, I am not about to stop being an eccentric.  But this could count as another instance of my deciding that sometimes, it's okay for me to do things that "regular people" do.

Edit, 2019-05-12: plans have changed. See edelsont.dreamwidth.org/8480.html.

 

I'm thinking it might be a good idea to change the way I use Dreamwidth. Here are some of my goals:

  • Post more frequently.
  • Post on a wider variety of topics: not almost always about politics and, in particular, about that awful man in the White House.
  • Take a more informal approach: closer to stream of consciousness, less like I was trying to write a paper for an academic journal.
  • More often, post about personal stuff.

In aid of all that, I am also experimenting with using a different "technology" for posting.  Probably more like the way that most other folks do it: just type my post into the window here on the site, using the "Rich Text" tab.


(You see, I have a well-established tendency to convince myself that I need to do things the hard way.  Or, I should say, a hard way; often, I invent my own.)


So we'll see how it goes.


The last three entries in this journal, like this one, all had subject lines beginning with "Impeachment: Why Not?"  None of them, however, was about reasons not to impeach President Trump.  Instead, they were about reasons why one might not choose to spend time, in the current situation, promoting the impeachment of President Trump.  See the difference?

The same is true of this one, except for one thing.  This isn't about why "one" might not "choose to spend time ... promoting the impeachment of President Trump."  This is more specific: not why "one" might not, but why I, personally, might not choose to keep on spending time on this.  (In fact, the chances are that, in the near future, I won't.)  There's more than one such personal reason, but, to a first approximation, they all boil down to one thing.

Reason Four: I Don't Want To

Okay, why don't I want to?

For one thing, I've developed a real craving to spend some time on things that have nothing to do with politics.  Computer programming, for instance.  It would be such a relief to take a break from worrying about mushy things like how to persuade someone of something.  With programming, it's much more straightforward: you write the program, you run it, and it either works or it doesn't.

And besides that, even when it is about politics -- even when it is about dealing with the nightmare that is the Trump presidency -- I'm not that sure that working for impeachment is the only way to go.  I can't shake the feeling that maybe what I, personally, really need to do is to move to Canada.  I'm not 100% sure about that, but I've reached the point where I am sure that I need to devote some serious time and energy to exploring that possibility more deeply.

At this point, my divided self manifests again.  To say such things, even in my head, provokes an angry response from another part of my mind.  It's a little like the argument I had with the lady in the peanut gallery, back in the entry headed "Impeachment: Are We There Yet?"  But this time, I will make it more obvious that I am arguing with myself, by presenting it as a dialogue between two "sides": the prosecution and the defense.

Prosecution: I am shocked -- shocked! -- that you would even consider such a selfish response.  You want to go off and write computer programs?  Isn't that a lot like fiddling while Rome burns?

And as for moving to Canada, that may be even worse.  You'd really save your own sorry butt, without a thought for the poor souls left behind?  I thought you were better than that.

Defense: That seems a little harsh.  With regard to the computer programming and other such alternate activities: when you have a big long-term project, sometimes you just need to take a break and do something else for a while.  It will probably benefit the project, in the long run, because you will come back to it fresher.

But more fundamentally, I'm not sure that this impeachment process is meant to be my project ... any more, at least.  Maybe I've already done the part of it that I'm even minimally qualified to do.

I can convince myself that there are good grounds for impeachment, in principle, based on what we already know, and on my own understanding of the Constitution.  But I already noted, back under "Impeachment: Why Not? (Reason 2)," that I am likely not the best person to convince others of this, if only because I am not a lawyer.

Besides, the question before us is not merely whether impeachment is justified, "in principle."  It's whether we should be throwing our efforts into making impeachment (and removal from office) actually happen.  And even if you assume that we could succeed in that -- maybe after the midterm elections? -- are we sure that it would be the best thing for the country?  (Assuming, again, that the grounds for impeachment are "just" the things we already know: that Trump hasn't, in the interim, made a blatant grab for dictatorial power.  If he does, that will change things.)

Because speaking for myself, I am not convinced, at least not yet (that removing Trump from office, before the end of his first term, and absent the "smoking gun," would be the best thing for the country).  I am not, however, aiming to start a discussion of whether it would be.  My point is simply that I don't feel like I'm the best qualified person to render an opinion on this.

In fact, I am sure that I am not qualified -- let alone the "best" qualified -- to render such an opinion.  Not at the moment, at least.  I am sure of this because I find that I don't even have an opinion on it ... not one that I'd feel comfortable sharing.

Perhaps I could develop one, in time.  But that's just "perhaps."  And, even if you assume that I could, I have no idea how long that would take.  I am almost sure that the only way I could do it, with real confidence in the result, would be ... wait for it ... first to clear my mind by taking a break from struggling with these issues, and, yes, to spend some time writing computer programs or something.

Prosecution: Unbelievable.  You are such a wimp (even if I, being you, say so myself).  Do you think that this is some sort of game?  The fate of the world may, quite literally, be at stake.

And you seem to be assuming that you can just take a pass, and someone else will take care of it.  But maybe you are the only one who can!  Maybe you are the one person who can think this through deeply enough, and find the right words to explain your conclusion, so that any rational person can read, and learn the truth.

Mind you, I can't prove that you are "the one."  But with so much at stake, since you can't prove that you're not the one person who can do it, aren't you obligated to try, whether you "want to" or not?

Defense: Got you, you self-righteous son of a bitch!  You fell right into my trap.

Prosecution: Huh?  What trap?

Defense: Let's grant you, "for the sake of the argument" (as we philosophers like to say), that you could get me, with continued liberal application of the whip, to write something that was ... acceptable.  Something that got the job done: that showed us all the safest way to get out of the Trump mess.

Except that in the real world, we'd never be really sure how much the outcome had been influenced by this thing I wrote.  Nor would we really know whether someone else could have written it, and maybe would have, if I had not.

But never mind that.  Here's something you can take to the bank.  If I actually did write something that was even potentially that important, then, before I finished it, I'd have at least half convinced myself that I actually was the only person who could have written it.  I know this for a fact, because it's happening to me right now.  And you know it too, because I'm you.

Prosecution: Yadda yadda.  What's all this about a trap?

Defense: You're going to have to put some big boy pants on, and be patient.  I'm getting there.

Now where was I?  Oh, yes.  I was saying that I would at least half convince myself that I really was the only person who could have written it.  And that would start me down a very dangerous path.

Prosecution: What are you talking about?

Defense: Once you start believing grandiose things like that about yourself, you can't stop.  It becomes an addiction: you keep on convincing yourself of more of them.  I -- we -- would be in serious danger of turning into another Donald Trump.

Prosecution: What ... oh.  I think I see where you're going with this.

Defense: Good; that means you're not as stupid as you look.  You remember, it was part of his standard stump speech.  He'd do his bad imitation of a hellfire-and-brimstone preacher, except he wasn't talking about the hereafter, he was talking about how awful everything supposedly was right now.  And then he'd finish that riff with these five words: "Only I can fix it."

Prosecution: [nods]

Defense: Which would have been fine, I guess; it was great theater ... for a certain sort of audience.  But then he had to go and win the damn thing.  So then everybody was watching him, to see if he could deliver.  And you know how that turned out.

So think about it.  Do you really want us to end up like he did?  The laughingstock of the planet?

Prosecution: [remains silent]

Defense: I didn't think so.


My name is Thomas Harold Edelson.  Welcome to my journal.

To repeat the most important sentence from my profile:

Spiritually, I am some combination of Quaker, Taoist, and pagan.


January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
4 567 8910
11121314151617
181920212223 24
25 262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 12:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios