This journal entry is not about Thanksgiving Day.

Then what?

This entry will be my [initial] response [first in this journal, anyway] to the fact that Donald Trump will be inaugurated, on 2025-01-20 [and for the second time], as President of the United States.

My first, instinctive response to that fact: “It sucks.”

No second thoughts about that! But I do want to add more nuance: to name several different feelings that this catastrophic event has evoked in me.

  • Depression: check.  Predominant during the first couple of weeks.

  • Despair: no.

  • Anger: surprisingly little.

  • Sadness: successor to depression (but not with a sharp transition).

  • Grief: (nuanced) successor to sadness.

  • Determination: not a successor to grief, an admixture with it.

The determination was triggered as I began to get serious with the question, “What shall I actually do about this [insert impolite word]?”  It tends to counteract what's left of the depression.

I have made real progress toward answering the “What shall I do?”question.  But nothing ready to be posted in this journal, yet.

"How to Decide What to Do" is the title of a recently-added page
of my “site” at The Well, located
at

https://people.well.com/user/edelsont/philosophy/01-intro.html

All that's there, so far, is the “Introduction”
… which is full of promises of what is to come.

I have unexpectedly developed a case of writer's block: I
haven't written even a line, yet, of the (or any) following
segment.

I do have a possible inkling as to why.  I was operating
under an assumption about what writing this “book” would
entail.  To wit, that it would require me to be completely
“open” about my inner, emotional life: to be prepared to
lay bare any relevant detail about my fears, desires, or any sort
of feelings.

And I didn't feel able (or, perhaps more accurately, willing)
to do that.  I still don't.

However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the project is
doomed.  I have a faint glimmering of an approach that would
allow me to write the thing, without doing the [emotional] Full
Monty to quite that degree.

It would not be exactly the same book, but I think maybe I could
accomplish my central goal.  I guess you — and I!
— will have to wait and see whether this works out.

I apologize for any inconvenience that this may cause.




 

It's been nearly a month since I returned from The Trip.  I'm ready to write about something else.


How about the end of an era?  Specifically, the 25-year era of Netflix DVDs.


As you may have heard, Netflix is shutting down that part of their business.   This coming Friday, 09-29, they will ship their last DVDs.  After that, the streaming service will be the only way to get your Netflix on.


I'm one of the (only one million) last holdouts: I've kept my DVD service going until the end.  It's a sad occasion for me.  I realized weeks ago that I felt the need to grieve it in some way, and I've devised a small ritual that will be my way of doing that.


You may scoff, not thinking such an event to be a big enough deal to grieve about.  I'll postpone saying why I'm doing it anyway.  First let me tell you about the ritual itself.


Background: Netflix has also announced that for any single subscriber, the last DVD that one receives need not be returned: you get to keep it.  This was the springboard for my plan: my ritual will be watching that last DVD.


Or actually, the ritual began with choosing that last DVD.  This became a non-trivial process; I considered many candidates.


It needed to be something I would want to watch more than once.  To be sure of that, it should probably be something I've seen before.


But there was another criterion, specific to the ritual per se.  To set the right tone, it needed to be a sad movie.  (Sad, not depressing.  To me, these words are very far from meaning the same thing.  If something is sad, then it isn't depressing.)


I chose Dead Man (1995), directed by Jim Jarmusch, with Johnny Depp in the title role.  (Okay, clarification: his character is not really dead, not in our white-people sense ... until the very end.)  If you're not familiar with this film, there's a pretty good plot summary at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Man.


Reading about the movie--or, better yet, seeing it--should give you some idea of the kind of "sad" I had in mind.  In turn, this hints at why I'm not perturbed by the scoffer's saying that the end of the Netflix DVD era is not a big enough deal to grieve about.


You see, as the idea took shape, I realized that I would not be grieving only the DVD business.  To some extent, yes, but it would also stand in for other things that, in my universe, need grieving.


By the way, I'm pretty sure that this idea (that a ritual can be explicitly about one thing, but also about other things, which may not be named out loud) is nothing new; it might even be quite familiar.  To those in the ritual biz, anyway.


I don't even think that I could explicitly name all the things that I feel the need to grieve about.  But here's a hint ....


Nothing lasts forever.

I really, really don't like summer.  Not in any of the places that I've lived since I left graduate school in 1972, at any rate.  All of those places have been in the Eastern time zone of the USA, and you will note that I now have completed fifty-one years of not liking summer.

What don't I like about it?  The weather, obviously.  The heat, and the humidity.  That's what you get in the eastern US.  Okay, bits of New England are partial exceptions, but still.

Would I be happier in a place like New Mexico, where it gets pretty hot but is always much less humid?  A few years back, I thought so.  I spent a non-trivial amount of time there, most recently in August of 2019, for the purpose of testing that hypothesis.  And what was my conclusion?

Strictly speaking, I suppose I would be happier there, weather-wise.  But not enough so.  I could conceivably still decide to move there, but, since that last trip, any real enthusiasm for the idea has pretty much evaporated.  Like summertime rain there: at times, you can see rain in the sky above you, but it doesn't reach the ground.

For that matter, my history of trying to escape from typical Eastern summers goes further back than that.  It was a big part of the motivation for the last move I actually did make: from the Raleigh area (in the region of North Carolina known as the Piedmont) to the Ashville area (in the western mountains of the same state).  It's the same story: I do like the summer weather here better than I did there, but not nearly enough so to make me glad when the summer begins.

In short, I really don't like summer.

It has come to my attention, however, that not everyone feels the same way.  There are even some, bless their strange little hearts, who enjoy what it's like in summer even in a place like Raleigh.

I invite you to tell us how you feel about summer weather.  About summers where you live, or — if so moved — about those in some other place you've been.

Okay, here's the long-promised continuation of my so-called "holiday newsletter."  First, a follow-up note to the first section, "computer programming," of the previous post: I finished several improvements to the Clojure code which calculates my income taxes, and got my federal and North Carolina returns filed.

What I promised for the continuation was some information about social interaction.

Background: I lead a pretty solitary life.  Not a surprise: computer programming and writing are both mostly solitary activities, and I spend so much time on them, by choice, that there's relatively little left for real-time interaction with other humans.

Too little, in fact.  And I am making that judgment, not on the basis of any general belief about how people "ought" to live, but on observation of myself.  Sometimes I "go with the flow" for an extended period while programming and/or writing, and end up in a tense state, all tied up in knots.

It took me a long time to realize that I was (often) getting tense because I had been solitary for too long.  But eventually I noticed something: not infrequently, if something led me to take "time out" from my "work," and spend an hour or two chatting informally with someone, I felt better—specifically, less tense—afterwards.  In fact, it finally sunk in, that would often enable me to go back to "work" more cheerfully … and do better at it.

Once I became conscious of this, I did something about it.  Actually, I became more consistent in something I was already doing … without consciously realizing why.  Since I saw that I didn't spontaneously devote enough time to social interaction, I started planning it.

This has evolved to the point where, currently, there are three people with whom I have scheduled weekly conversations.  The nature of the conversations is not so very different from ones that might occur without prearrangement.  But when two people agree in advance to talk at a particular time, then it happens more often.  For me, and these three friends, at least.

I am very grateful to these people.  With their help, I like to say, I have managed to turn myself from a "ridiculously extreme introvert" into a [merely] "extreme introvert."

There's room for improvement.  Not necessarily more of the same modality, though I don't rule that out.  I've been thinking about my use of Internet "social media" (such as Dreamwidth itself).

There are some limitations, pretty much built in, as to how personally meaningful—how deep, if you will—such interactions tend to be.  But perhaps, if folks figure out how, those limitations can be largely overcome.  I hope to say more about this, soon, in another journal entry.

"You don't own me."  Those are the words I submitted to Craiyon; it gave me back nine pictures, as usual; and together, the words and the pictures make up the artifact shown below.  Take a look.

You don't own me.

These are the darkest Craiyon pictures I've posted yet.  Literally; and also, ain't nobody looks happy here.

This didn't surprise me: at an intuitive, emotional level, the pictures seemed a good match for the words.  But the "logical" part of my brain begged to differ.  It spake thus:

"If Person X doesn't own Person Y, isn't that a good thing, not a bad one?  Nobody should own anybody, right?  So when interpersonal non-ownership is asserted, one would expect the feelings inspired by this to be happy, not sad."

So why aren't they?

This is a real question.  I invite you to think about it.

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
1920 2122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 30th, 2025 06:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios